top of page

La primera parte del sexto reporte del IPCC | 09

- Climate Action Tracker, “2100 Warming Projections”.

Link: https://urlshort.in/zPAnv 

- IPCC, “AR6 Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis”.

Link: https://urlshort.in/qcUMv 

- IPCC, “Climate change widespread, rapid, and intensifying – IPCC”.

Link: https://urlshort.in/bVjtx 

- IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. In Press.

Link: https://urlshort.in/OCVJT 

- Outrage + Optimism Podcast, “Bonus: IPCC Report: The tipping point for action with Michael Mann”.

Link: https://urlshort.in/YEZqS

EPTLE05

La teoría de Gaia | Te lo explico brevemente 05

- Boston, P. J. (2008). Gaia Hypothesis. In S. E., Jørgensen & B. D., Fath (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Ecology (pp. 1727–1731). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00735-7

- Corresponsal de Paz, “Gaia, la teoría científica que argumenta lo obvio: la Tierra está viva”.

Link: https://urlshort.in/BtaCi 

- Cultura Inquieta, “La hipótesis de Gaia: la Tierra no es una piedra, todos somos parte de un súper organismo”.

Link: https://urlshort.in/ljJhW 

- Harvard Department of Earth and Planetary Sciencies, “Gaia hypothesis”.

Link: https://urlshort.in/zQmdW 

- Hortua Cortes, E. A. (2007). Hipótesis de Gaia. Universidad Distrital “Francisco José de Caldas”.

Link: https://urlshort.in/vcEUA 

- Kensington TV, “James Lovelock Explains Gaia Hypothesis on the Sacred Balance (TV)”.

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44yiTg7cOVI 

- Kirchner, J. W. (2002). The Gaia Hypothesis: Fact, Theory, and Wishful Thinking. Climatic Change, 52(4), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014237331082 

- Nature, “James Lovelock at 100: the Gaia saga continues”.

Link: https://cutt.ly/rNemGxm 

- Quercus, “Gaia, una vision holística de la Tierra”.

Link: https://urlshort.in/xLNQP 

- Rushton, E. An analysis of the Impact of the Gaia Theory on Ecology and Evolutionary Theory. Department of Anthropology & Geography and Anthropology, Oxford Brookes University. 

Link: https://urlshort.in/NnOTD 

- The Conversation, “Scientists finally have an explanation for the Gaia puzzle”.

Link: https://urlshort.in/VTchF 

 

EPTLE04

Ecocidio | Te lo explico brevemente 04

- BBVA OpenMind, “La historia del ecocidio, un nuevo crimen contra la humanidad”.

Link: https://urlshort.in/VPcgi 

- El Mostrador, “Buscan que término ‘ecocidio’ sea reconocido por la CPI como crimen internacional: se trata de ‘ilícitos’ que destruyan el medio ambiente”.

Link: https://urlshort.in/qcAHg 

- El País, “Ecocidio, un nuevo delito para proteger al planeta de la humanidad”.

Link: https://urlshort.in/TIgDE 

- El País, “La abogada que abandonó una prometedora carrera para defender al planeta”

Link: https://urlshort.in/vbqqg 

- Gauger, A. et al (2012). The Ecocide Project ‘Ecocide is the missing 5th Crime Against Peace’. Human Rights Consortium University of London. Link: https://cutt.ly/fB4OJnZ 

- Higgins, P. (2012). “Seeding Intrinsic Values: How a Law of Ecocide will Shift our Consciousness”.

Link: https://cutt.ly/TB4OApt 

- Neira, H., Russo, L.I. & Álvarez, B.S. (2019). Ecocidio. Revista de filosofía, 76, 126–148.

https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-43602019000200127 

- Outrage + Optimism Podcast, “Jojo Mehta on ecocide and ending impunity”.

Link: https://cutt.ly/dB4OCzp 

- Stop Ecocidio, “Qué es el ecocidio”.

Link: https://stopecocidio.org/que-es-el-ecocidio 

- TEDx, “Ecocide, the 5th Crime Against Peace: Polly Higgins at TedxExeter”. 

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EuxYzQ65H4 

EP08

¿Cuál es el impacto de los Monocultivos? | 08

- Andrén, O. & Kätterer, T. (2008). Agriculture Systems. In B., Fath (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Ecology (2nd ed., pp. 401–406). https://doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-63768-0.00313-9

- Baltodano, J. (2000). Monoculture forestry: a critique from an ecological perspective. Tree Trouble: a Compilation of Testimonies on the Negative Impact of Large-scale Monoculture Tree Plantations Prepared for the 6th COP of the FCCC. Friends of the Earth International, pp. 2–10. 

- Bláha, J. & Matjková, I. (2000). Spruce Monocultures in the Czech Republic The Sumava Mountains Case Study. Tree Trouble: a Compilation of Testimonies on the Negative Impact of Large-scale Monoculture Tree Plantations Prepared for the 6th COP of the FCCC. Friends of the Earth International, pp. 45–52.

- Braun, A.C. et al (2017). Assessing the impact of plantation forestry on plant biodiversity: A comparison of sites in Central Chile and Chilean Patagonia. Global Ecology and Conservation, 10, 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.03.006

- Brockerhoff, E.G. et al (2008). Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodiversity and Conservation, 17(5), 925–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x 

- Ching Liu, C.L., Kuchma, O. & Krutovsky, K.V. (2018). Mixed-species versus monocultures in plantation forestry: Development, benefits, ecosystem services and perspectives for the future. Global Ecology and Conservation, 15, e00419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00419

- Cifuentes-Croquevielle, C., Stanton, D.E. & Armesto, J.J. (2020). Soil invertebrate diversity loss and functional changes in temperate forest soils replaced by exotic pine plantations. Scientific Reports, 10, 7762.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64453-y 

- CORMA, Corporación Chilena de la Madera, “El agua y las plantaciones forestales”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3eYkycE 

- Diario UChile, “Monocultivos: el alimento predilecto de los incendios forestales, una vez más”.

Link: https://bit.ly/2Dg5PTK 

- Estades, C.F. (1994). Impacto de la sustitución del bosque natural por plantaciones de Pinus radiata sobre una comunidad de aves en la Octava Región de Chile. Boletín Chileno de Ornitología, 1, 8–14. 

- Figueroa, R.A.R. & Quintana, V.A. (2001). Comunidad invernal de aves en un paisaje agroforestal del centro-sur de Chile. Boletín Chileno de Ornitología, 8, 31–35.  

- Frene, C.C. & Núñez-Ávila, M. (2010). Hacia un nuevo Modelo Forestal en Chile. Revista Bosque Nativo, 47, 25–35. 

- Ladera Sur, “El impacto invisible de los monocultivos de pinos en la fertilidad y biodiversidad del suelo”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3TuM1Sf 

- Lamb, D. (2004). Forest Rehabilitation. In J., Burley (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Forest Sciences (pp. 1033–1039). https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-145160-7/00211-8

- Larjavaara, M. (2008). A review on benefits and disadvantages of tree diversity. The Open Forest Science Journal, 1, 24–26. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874398600801010024 

- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, “Diversity in a monoculture”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3MZOKAE 

- Naudts, K. et al (2016). Europe’s forest management did not mitigate climate warming. Science, 351, 597–600. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad7270  

- Oyarzún, C.E. et al (2011). Soil hydrological properties and sediment transport in two headwater catchments with different vegetative cover at the Coastal Mountain Range in southern Chile. Bosque (Valdivia), 32(1), 10–19. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002011000100002

- Pauchard, A. et al (2014). Pináceas invasoras en el sur de Sudamérica: Patrones, mecanismos e impactos potenciales. En Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile. Invasiones biológicas en Chile: Causas globales e impactos locales, 11, 283–308. Link: https://bit.ly/3MWZ38F 

- Raffaele, E., Núñez, M.A. & Relva, M.A. (2015). Plantaciones de coníferas exóticas en Patagonia: los riesgos de plantar sin un manejo adecuado. Ecologia Austral, 25(2), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.15.25.2.0.153 

- Richardson D.R., Van Wilgen B.W. & Núñez, M.A. (2008). Alien conifer invasions in South America: short fuse burning? Biological Invasions, 10, 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9140-y 

- Simberloff, D. et al (2010). Spread and impact of introduced conifers in south America: lessons from other southern hemisphere regions. Austral Ecology, 35(5), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02058.x 

- The Nature Conservancy, “Monocultivos: la amenaza de los ‘desiertos verdes’ de hoy para la producción alimentaria de mañana”. Link: https://bit.ly/3eVt9Nh 

EPTLE03

COP26 | Te lo explico brevemente 03

- Alok Sharma, El Mostrador, “COP26 la última esperanza: cuatro objetivos para salvar al planeta”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3DlSABa 

- BBC, “Climate Change: What is COP26, and why is it happening in Glasgow in 2021?”.

Link: https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/51372486 

- Deutsche Welle, “La COP26, última esperanza para frenar alza de temperaturas”. 

Link: https://bit.ly/3F8quuh 

- Euronews, “What is COP26 and why it is so important?”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3TQ7CnU 

- The Chemical Engineer, “Climate crisis explainer: what is COP26 and why is it important?”

Link: https://bit.ly/3U55wB5 

- UN Climate Change Conference UK 2021, “COP 26 Explained”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3F4uoEJ

 

EP07

El agua de los ríos no se pierde cuando llega al mar | 07

- Boisier, J.P. et al (2016): Anthropogenic and natural contributions to the Southeast Pacific precipitation decline and recent megadrought in central Chile. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(1), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067265

- Campoblanco, H.D. & Gomero J.T. (2000): Importancia de los ríos en el entorno ambiental. Revista del Instituto de Investigación de la Facultad de Geología, Minas, Metalurgia y Ciencias Geográficas, 3(5). Link: https://bit.ly/3VR3G8p 

- Center for Climate and Resilience Research, “El agua de los ríos no se pierde cuando llega al mar”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3bVmqOE

- Encalada, A. (2017): Funciones ecosistémicas y diversidad de los ríos. Reflexiones sobre el concepto de caudal ecológico y su aplicación en el Ecuador. Laboratorio de Ecología Acuática, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito. Link: https://bit.ly/3srv3Iw 

- Hanson, P., Springer, M. & Ramirez, A. (2010): Capítulo 1: Introducción a los grupos de macroinvertebrados acuáticos. Revista de Biología Tropical, 58(4), 3–37. Link: https://doi.org.10.15517/rbt.v58i4.20080 

- Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad, “Científicos sobre la Carretera Hídrica: se asume que el agua del río Bío Bío sobra, y eso es una falacia”. Link: https://bit.ly/3gyHWhw 

- Magdaleno, F.M.: Funciones y funcionamiento del bosque de ribera. Área de Ingeniería Ambiental, Centro de Estudios de Técnicas Aplicadas, CEDEX (Ministerio de Fomento-Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino).

Link: https://bit.ly/3f0orhp 

- Massoti, I. M. et al (2018): The influence of river discharge on nutrient export and phytoplankton biomass off the Central Chile Coast (33°–37°S): Seasonal cycle and interannual variability. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5, 423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00423 

- McCabe, D. J. (2011): Rivers and Streams: Life in Flowing Water. Nature Education Knowledge 3(10), 19.

Link: https://go.nature.com/3CYnmi0 

- Orrego, J.P. (2002): El Estado de las Aguas Terrestres en Chile: cursos y aguas subterráneas. Fundación Terram.

Link: https://bit.ly/3D37U4p 

- Pérez, C.A. et al (2015): Influence of climate and land use in carbon biogeochemistry in lower reaches of rivers in central southern Chile: Implications for the carbonate system in river-influenced rocky shore environments. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci., 120, 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JG002699 

- Vargas, C.A. et al (2020): Environmental costs of water transfers. Nature Sustainability, 3(6), 408–409. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0526-5 

- Vörösmarty, C.J. et al (2018): Ecosystem-based water security and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 18(4), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2018.07.004 

- Wetz, M.S. et al (2011): Severe droughts reduce estuarine primary productivity with cascading effects on higher trophic levels. Limnology & Oceanography, 56, 627–638. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2011.56.2.0627 

- World Wildlife Fund (2007): Pipedream? Inter Basin Water Transfer and Water Shortages.

Link: https://bit.ly/3eVELQm 

EPTLE02

PPM, un número súper importante | Te lo explico brevemente 02

- CarbonBrief, “Met Office: Atmospheric CO2 now hitting 50% higher than pre-industrial levels”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3VVARYi 

- Climate Central, “What Passing a Key CO2 Mark Means to Climate Scientists”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3Do88Ek 

- El Ágora, “El CO2 ya será en 2021 un 50% más alto que en la era preindustrial”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3CSh2bG 

- El Salto, “Un paso más hacia el desastre: nuevo máximo histórico de CO2 en la atmósfera”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3f4rchw 

- Expansión, “¿Qué significa rebasar 400 ppm CO2?

Link: https://bit.ly/3CRjuPS 

- Hansen, J. et al (2008): Target Atmospheric CO2: Where should humanity aim? The Open Atmosferic Scientific Journal, 2, 217–231. DOI: 10.2174/1874282300802010217  

- La Vanguardia, “Récord de dióxido de carbono en la atmósfera pese a la pandemia”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3TKm1Ce 

- NASA Global Climate Change, “Carbon Dioxide”.

Link: https://go.nasa.gov/3z6C1Xt 

- Our Children’s Trust, “Policies Must Be Based on 350 ppm and 1 Degree Celsius to Protect Young People and Future Generations”. Link: https://bit.ly/3TI8ECo

 

EPTLE01

Criptomonedas y Cambio Climático | Te lo explico brevemente 01

- BBC, “How Bitcoin’s vast energy use could burst its bubble”.

Link: https://bbc.in/3VVzyss 

- Crypto Español en Youtube, “Cómo funciona bitcoin.  Wallets, mineros, forks, blockchain. Explicación sencilla y completa en español”. Link: https://bit.ly/3N1nDFI 

- Crypto Español en Youtube, “Cómo funciona Blockchain. Explicación sencilla visual en español”.

Link: https://bit.ly/2qx7yhD 

- Entrepeneur, “Is Bitcoin really as bad for the environment as some think?”.

Link: https://futurorenovable.cl/category/rios-libres/ 

- The Conversation, “Bitcoin isn’t getting greener: four environmental myths about cryptocurrency debunked”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3DoA8I9 

- The Conversation, “¿Es bitcóin más perjudicial para el medio ambiente que la banca tradicional?”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3z7Keuo 

- The Guardian, “Electricity needed to mine bitcoin is more than used by entire countries”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3soySOI 

- The New Yorker, “Why Bitcoin is bad for the environment?”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3skGZvF

EP06

¿Cómo deberíamos transportarnos en un mundo más sustentable? | 06

- BBC, “Attenborough: Curb excess capitalism to save nature”.

Link: https://bbc.in/3TtLNuR 

- Carbonocero, “El Cambio Climático Somos Todos”.

Link: https://carbonocero.org/ 

- CeroCO2, “Te ayudamos a ser neutro en CO2”.

Link: https://ceroco2.org/  

- Electromaps, “Mapa de puntos de recarga en Chile”.

Link: https://bit.ly/2wt6pu6 

- El País, “Francia avanza para prohibir los vuelos internos que se puedan hacer en tren en menos de dos horas y media”. Link: https://n9.cl/ejshz 

- Gobierno de Chile, “Contribución Determinada a Nivel Nacional (NDC) de Chile, 2020”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3CTWO1o 

- Grottera, C. et al (2020): The role of lifestyle changes in low-emissions development strategies: an economy-wide assessment for Brazil. Climate Policy, 20, 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1717415 

- International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), “Costos de generación de energía renovable en 2019, Conclusiones Principales”. Link: https://bit.ly/3tfLwhd 

- International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), “Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2019”. Link: https://bit.ly/3f3Gljb 

- La Tercera, “La revolución de los autos eléctricos en Chile y el mundo”. Link: https://n9.cl/k8p9i 

- Our World in Data, “Cars, planes, trains: where do CO2 emissions from transport come from?”.

Link: https://n9.cl/70cy3 

- Outrage + Optimism Podcast, “The future of flight”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3eULjyK 

- Outrage + Optimism Podcast, “The future of shipping”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3Dm8RWO 

- Solar Impulse Foundation, “1000+ efficient and profitable solutions to protect the environment”.

Link: https://solarimpulse.com/ 

- TED, “Bertrand Piccard y su aventura solar”.

Link: https://n9.cl/dirx  

- United Nations Climate Change, “Race to Zero Campaign”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3eRC6Yc 

- Vohra, K. et al (2021): Global mortality from outdoor fine particle pollution generated by fossil fuel combustion: Results from GEOS-Chem. Environmental Research, 195, 110754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110754

EP05

Consumo Consciente: Tecnologías | 05

- Chauhan, S. “Environmental and health hazards of mobile devices and wireless communication”. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Texas. Link: https://bit.ly/3sk1JUs 

- Fast Company, “Smartphones are killing the planet faster than anyone expected”.

Link: https://bit.ly/2B3B2cZ 

- Fishbein, B.K. (2002): Waste in the Wireless World: The Challenge of Cell Phones, The Toxic Content of Cell Phones and Other Electronic Devices. Link: https://bit.ly/3Stqw2Q 

- Reset, “The social and environmental impacts of mobile phones”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3Sy74C5 

- Senthil Velmurugan, M. (2016): Environmental Hazards and Health Risks Associated with the Use of Mobile Phones. Journal of Green Engineering, 5(2), 151–174. Link: https://bit.ly/3DlW72o 

- Tchernitchin, A. N. et al (2011): Efectos de la radiación electromagnética no ionizante sobre la salud y el caso específico de los efectos en la salud humana de la telefonía celular. Cuad. Méd. Soc (Chile), 51(4), 187–217. 

- Tecnología Libre de Conflicto, “Medio ambiente y dispositivos electrónicos”. 

Link: https://bit.ly/2KDmHX1 

-TEDEd, “The story of electronics”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3Sy6QuJ 

- TEDEd, “What’s in your smartphone?”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3SuIH8m 

- TEDEd, “Where does your phone come from”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3SBhCkg 

- The New York Times, “The dirt in the new machine”.

Link: https://nyti.ms/3F8rgaX 

-The Story of Stuff Project, “La historia de las cosas”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3VWFAt5 

- Treehugger, “The environmental costs (and benefits) of our cell phones”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3z6kuyA 

- Zahoor, S. et al (2017): The green 2020: Impact of smartphones on the environment in present and future. 2017 International Conference on Communication Technologies (ComTech). Link: https://bit.ly/3sm3bpn 

EP04

Consumo Consciente: Plásticos | 04

- BBC, “Plastic recycling: Why are 99.75% of coffee cups not recycled?” 

Link: https://bbc.in/2RM3Dtc 

- Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), “Plastic & Climate. The Hidden Costs of a Plastic Planet”.

Link: https://bit.ly/2Yzlvui 

- Deutsche Welle, “Residuos plásticos y su impacto ambiental”.

Link: https://bit.ly/2L8YADv 

- Green Education Foundation, “Tips to use less plastic”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3Dlks8u 

- Greenpeace, “¿Cómo llega el plástico a los océanos y qué sucede entonces?”

Link: https://bit.ly/2PZkQS2 

- Grottera, C. et al (2020): The role of lifestyle changes in low-emissions development strategies: an economy-wide assessment for Brazil, Climate Policy, 20(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1717415

- Heinrich Böll Stiftung, “Climate change: not green, but greenhouse”. 

Link: https://bit.ly/3TQhrCD 

- Heinrich Böll Stiftung, “La crisis de la contaminación plástica”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3Svd26V 

- Maocai Shen et al (2020): (Micro)plastic crisis: Un-ignorable contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120138

- My Plastic Free Life, “100 steps to a plastic-free life”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3eUNVg2 

- Sea Turtle Biologist, “Sea Turtle with Straw up its nostril – No to plastic straws”. 

Link: https://bit.ly/3MVs5Wl 

- Sin Envase, “Tienda de comestibles y especialidades”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3skKrqb 

- Stafford, R. & Jones, P.J.S (2019): Viewpoint – Ocean plastic pollution: A convenient but distracting truth? Marine Policy, 103, 187–191. Link: https://bit.ly/3Sr6lTl 

- Stephanie Schuttler, “23 easy ways to reduce your plastic use in your daily life”. 

Link: https://bit.ly/3TKq1CP 

- The Guardian, “A million bottles a minute: world’s plastic binge as dangerous as climate change”.

Link: https://bit.ly/3F8fihe 

- The Sea Cleaners, “Plastics, greenhouse effect, carbon footprint and global warming”. 

Link: https://bit.ly/3VVCipK 

- Trash is for Tossers by Lauren Singer, “To buy or DIY? 8 Easy DIY Beauty Tips”. 

Link: https://bit.ly/3D11zWS 

- WWF, “Ten tips to reduce your plastic footprint”.

Link: https://bit.ly/2HgpC62 

- Yale Climate Connections, “How plastics contribute to climate change. They generate heat-trapping gases at every stage of their life cycle”. Link: https://bit.ly/3CYNNEq 

EP03

Consumo Consciente: Industria de la Moda | 03

- BBC, “Could circular economics fix the planet?”

Link: https://bbc.in/3VRvbPg 

- BBC, “Fast fashion is harming the planet, MPs say.”

Link: https://bbc.in/2Qt1e5B 

- Business Insider, “The fashion industry emits more carbon than international flights and maritime shipping combined. Here are the biggest ways it impacts the planet.” Link: https://bit.ly/3snHVzA 

- Esturirafi,  “12 Tejidos sostenibles y certificaciones textiles.”

Link: https://bit.ly/2sY4j46 

- Esturirafi, “Greenpeace Detox. Ropa sin tóxicos.”

Link: https://bit.ly/3MW0Niy 

- Greenpeace, “Time out for fast fashion.”

Link: https://bit.ly/3CWXXFn 

- Joanes, T., Gwozdz W. &, Klöckner, C.A. (2020). Reducing personal clothing consumption: A cross-cultural validation of the comprehensive action determination model, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101396

- LaSexta, “José Mujica habla sobre el consumismo.”

Link: https://bit.ly/3MZSAKd 

- Niinimäki, K. et al (2020): The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1, 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9

- Soper, Kate, “The other pleasures of post-consumerism.”

Link: https://bit.ly/3FgBEx4 

- Sustain Your Style, “The fashion industry is the second largest polluter in the world.” 

Link: https://bit.ly/3eX0BD7 

- The Guardian, “Just 100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions, study says.” 

Link: https://bit.ly/3soCKze 

- Universidad de Palermo, “Fast fashion y su impacto ambiental.”

Link: https://bit.ly/3F2TFPA 

- Vox, “Can consumer choices ward off the worst effects of climate change? An expert explains.”

Link: https://bit.ly/2QVyORP 

EP02

¿Por qué me debería importar que la temperatura promedio global suba 1,5ºC? | 02

- BBC, “Climate change: 'Hothouse Earth' risks even if CO2 emissions slashed.”

Link: https://cutt.ly/sNw8FV6 

- BBC, “Final call to save the world from 'climate catastrophe'.”

Link: https://cutt.ly/DNw8Saq 

- BBC, “What does 1.5C mean in a warming world?”

Link: https://cutt.ly/5Nw8O9m 

- Chartable, “What different degrees of global warming look like.” 

Link: https://cutt.ly/VNw8UDN 

- Climate Analytics, “Global warming reaches 1ºC above preindustrial, warmest in more than 11,000 years.”

Link: https://bit.ly/2ktG1yd 

- Green Facts, “A global climate 1.5° Celsius degree warmer: how does the IPCC consider it will affect the world?”

Link: https://bit.ly/3TKvjOH 

- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), “Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5º Celsius.”

Link: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/ 

- Jensen, E.G. et al (2018): Environmental warming and feminization of one of the largest sea turtle populations in the world. Current Biology, 28, 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.057  

- NASA, “A degree of concern: why global temperatures matter.”

Link: https://go.nasa.gov/2Rzlg00 

- NOAA Climate.gov, “A global warming of 1.8° F (1° C) seems small, so why is this change in global temperature a concern?” Link: https://bit.ly/3eUSo2i 

- Schleussner, C.F. et al (2016): Differential climate impacts for policy-relevant limits to global warming: the case of 1.5ºC and 2ºC. Earth System Dynamics, 7, 327–351. 

Link: https://cutt.ly/QNw8nh2 

- Sociología Crítica, Maisa Rojas, climatóloga: “Nuestras estimaciones sobre los riesgos del cambio climático fueron muy conservadoras”. Link: https://bit.ly/3TsRsBl 

- Stockholm Resilience Center, “Planet at risk of heading towards “Houthouse Earth” state.”

Link: https://cutt.ly/eNw8yRV 

- The Climate Reality Project, “Why is 1.5 degrees the danger line for global warming?”

Link: https://cutt.ly/sNw8zM7 

- The Conversation, “Why is climate change’s 2 degrees Celsius of warming limit so important?”

Link: https://cutt.ly/cNw8apw 

- The New York Times, “Why half a degree of global warming is a big deal.” 

Link: https://cutt.ly/qNw8kgM 

- Yale Environment 360, “What would a global warming increase of 1.5 degrees be like?”

Link: https://cutt.ly/sNw8fk7 

EP01

¿Por qué es bueno para el medio ambiente que Trump pierda las elecciones? | 01

- BBC, “US election 2020: What the results will mean for climate change.” 

Link: https://cutt.ly/LNw4W9P 

- Brookings.edu, “¿Cuál es la trayectoria del gobierno de Trump en materia ambiental?“

Link: https://cutt.ly/cNw85qK  

- Earth.org, “What Would a Second Trump Term Mean for the Environment?”

Link: https://cutt.ly/BNw4Tm6 

- NASA, “Scientific Consensus: Earth's Climate is Warming.”

Link: https://cutt.ly/ONw4U44 

- National Geographic, “A running list of how President Trump is changing environmental policy.”

Link: https://cutt.ly/HNw4q1I 

- National Geographic, “Trump vs. Biden on the environment—here’s where they stand.”

Link: https://cutt.ly/ENw4rKu 

- Natural Resources Defense Council, “The Polluter President: Tracking Trump’s Attacks on the Environment.”

Link: https://cutt.ly/cNw4ySI 

- Trump White House, “Statement by President Trump on the Paris Climate Accord.”

Link: https://cutt.ly/xNw4zOj 

- Union of Concerned Scientists, “Each Country's Share of CO2 Emissions.”

Link: https://cutt.ly/7Nw4pSy 

- World Resources Institute, “7 Ways the Trump Administration Is Harming the Climate.”

Link: https://cutt.ly/0Nw4bGd 

bottom of page